An argument that the us is justified in spending billions of dollars on nasa space missions to mars

Its not a waste Space travel has given us a lot of new things for example the micro chip, the CAT scan and so on. This is true in that 7. This is were research happens. GPS Very critical if your lost somewhere, has saved lives! No-one is going to argue against the value of knowledge but there is a greater value in spending more on food supplies which has a certain result of feeding the hungry, whereas certain results are not present in the theory of discovering a sustainable planet.

NASA is very damgerous. When they send people to give them prepared food and medication, what will happen when they leave? Look at the casualties of war and the waste of resources and land. If we decided to stop "wasting" money on space programs, we can say goodbye to many new developments that will be out of reach of garage scientist and we can expect to be overwhelmed with visitors in the skies above the US.

To attack space exploration in this manner is to attack the purpose of scientific research in general. They focus their research on aerospace and the universe, but that is not just it. All the by-products of the space race could have been developed by commercial companies aiming to make a profit by developing good products and selling them, at a fraction of the cost: Many discoveries have been made as a result of Space Exploration Many discoveries and products have been developed from the knowledge gained from space exploration.

So many accidents and problems happened in the space shuttles such as explosions, pieces falling off, and missing the gravity on Earth. We now feel the same about space, human kind has always needed answers, questions temp us, pull us together and satisfy us when we find the answer.

Innovations in computing were needed.

Should the U.S. spend billions of dollars on space exploration?

I know I would. Although the cost is not high relative to other government expenditure, it is still an additional cost that the taxpayer is burdened with. The printing press would have remained in Germany unless some other nation happened to stumble on the same process. Humanity is the number one priority; keeping the human race alive is a necessity.

And something is going to happen and we will ALL be dead or starving on this planet because we refused to move on and advance the survival of our species; all pissed away on supporting some people that would probably just as soon let us starve if we were the ones without food and they were the rich ones.

Not joking, thank you for that. Very important for hurricanes and dangerous storm systems, have saved lives and help us prepare for the worst. The thousands of starving people cannot survive without food so why spend money on products which we do not need.

They are paid through grants and funding to and from government agencies, paid to companies to develop or innovate current models or ideas, and in turn, those companies pay for the materials and the manpower to manifest those ideas. Production of these product leads to redevelopment, sales and distribution - all of which leads to more jobs; somebody has to build, sell, and repair.

The Earth itself is not fully explored yet Space exploration has always been a gimmick. Yes, because Thinking that the budget devoted to space exploration is wasted moneywe believe that this kind of exploratin is a wild dream that we cannot achieve and the huge amounts of money are gone in smoke rather than to spend these amounts to relieve poverty in the Third World and medical researches should be encouraged instead these explorations.

Mars has been dubbed the Earth due to it's availability to terraforming. The problem is that the perceived risk of space is far higher than it actually is, and that our community is perceived as out of touch.

Keeping this in mind, the amount of the US budget allocated to all scientific pursuits, of which NASA is a member, totaled at The argument that humanity will need to find a new habitat to survive is a stretch and paranoid.

We should learn more about Earth and the ocean before wasting time and money on Space exploration. There are numerous more examples that you can Google for yourself. They knew the risks, and they took it for the sake of knowledge.

What if a disaster happens in the U. Read what this astronaut has to say about it.

Nasa budgets: US spending on space travel since 1958 UPDATED

The lack of expansion would cut down on the many technological and scientific innovations that are made possible by further space exploration and the development that is needed to reach further into the solar system. How do we change this? Why do we have to send some christian missionaries over to dig them a well?

A private company would never expand beyond this region without serious incentives because the risk would outweigh the potential reward. And as there are millions round the world who are starving to death, when people spend more and more money on space technology they should realize they are the killers.An Argument That the U.S.

Is Justified in Spending Billions of Dollars on NASA Space Missions to Mars PAGES 2. WORDS 1, View Full Essay. More essays like this: nasa space missions to mars, modern space program, john f kennedy. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin -. Imagine NASA builds a moon base, and from that base humans go to Mars and build a Mars base.

Then imagine from there we go to the stars. We can already get to Mars with current technology, instead we spend money on killing machines. The Case For NASA: Refuting The Arguments Against The Agency. by Ryan McLain in Other May 30, 7 The primary argument against NASA is always that it costs too much when The United States is sixteen trillion dollars in debt.

What many voters who think that don’t realize is that NASA’s budget was merely % of the Federal Budget. NASA: Sorry Jimmy, we need these billions of dollars for space exploration Jimmy: Will it help feed me? NASA: No, but if another Jimmy, say, in 50 years, need to know if there was water in Mars, he will know, thanks to us.

Should the U.S. spend billions of dollars on space exploration? thinking of sending people to Mars as well. However, have you ever considered the cost of this program? NASA siphons up billions of dollars every year on space exploration.

global warming. Over the years, NASA has accumulated its amount spent to about billion dollars. Space Exploration is a waste of resources. Instead of decreasing resources by space travel and such, we must deal with problems on Earth first. Space Exploration has given us many,many technologies that are essential.

Any other scientist could have come up with those same inventions without spending billions of dollars. Seriously, no.

An argument that the us is justified in spending billions of dollars on nasa space missions to mars
Rated 5/5 based on 47 review